axis ( "off" ) # Plot losses as a function of optimization iteration def plot_losses ( losses ): fig = plt. no_grad (): predicted_images = renderer ( predicted_mesh ) plt. # Show a visualization comparing the rendered predicted mesh to the ground truth # mesh def visualize_prediction ( predicted_mesh, renderer = renderer_silhouette, target_image = target_rgb, title = '', silhouette = False ): inds = 3 if silhouette else range ( 3 ) with torch.
target_rgb = for i in range ( num_views )] target_cameras =, T = T ) for i in range ( num_views )] extend ( num_views ) # Render the cow mesh from each viewing angle target_images = renderer ( meshes, cameras = cameras, lights = lights ) # Our multi-view cow dataset will be represented by these 2 lists of tensors, # each of length num_views. # Meshes has a useful `extend` method which allows us do this very easily. The textured # Phong shader will interpolate the texture uv coordinates for each vertex, # sample from a texture image and apply the Phong lighting model renderer = MeshRenderer ( rasterizer = MeshRasterizer ( cameras = camera, raster_settings = raster_settings ), shader = SoftPhongShader ( device = device, cameras = camera, lights = lights ) ) # Create a batch of meshes by repeating the cow mesh and associated textures. raster_settings = RasterizationSettings ( image_size = 128, blur_radius = 0.0, faces_per_pixel = 1, ) # Create a Phong renderer by composing a rasterizer and a shader. Refer to docs/notes/renderer.md for an # explanation of the difference between naive and coarse-to-fine rasterization. We also leave # bin_size and max_faces_per_bin to their default values of None, which sets # their values using heuristics and ensures that the faster coarse-to-fine # rasterization method is used. Refer to # rasterize_meshes.py for explanations of these parameters. As we are rendering images for visualization # purposes only we will set faces_per_pixel=1 and blur_radius=0.0. Here we set the output # image to be of size 128X128. R, T = look_at_view_transform ( dist = 2.7, elev = elev, azim = azim ) cameras = OpenGLPerspectiveCameras ( device = device, R = R, T = T ) # We arbitrarily choose one particular view that will be used to visualize # results camera = OpenGLPerspectiveCameras ( device = device, R = R, T = T ) # Define the settings for rasterization and shading. So we can view the camera from the a distance of dist=2.7, and # then specify elevation and azimuth angles for each viewpoint as tensors. All the cameras helper methods support mixed type inputs and # broadcasting. lights = PointLights ( device = device, location = ]) # Initialize an OpenGL perspective camera that represents a batch of different # viewing angles. As mentioned above, the front of # the cow is facing the -z direction. linspace ( - 180, 180, num_views ) # Place a point light in front of the object. linspace ( 0, 360, num_views ) azim = torch. num_views = 20 # Get a batch of viewing angles.
I've lost too many games because of weirdness, screwups, and outdated processes related to that thing.# the number of different viewpoints from which we want to render the mesh. Sorry for the rant but e-license is a peeve of mine. They just enjoy those games more than the new stuff.
#Wmma 5 silhouette renders series#
There are still a lot of people who play the 'Extreme Wrestling' games, which are about 15 years old and were the precursor to the TEW series that's now out. It's not just one or two people who believe that way about the new releases. I'd load up WMMA2 to check that theory, but of course I'm not able to play that anymore either. I don't know what 5 is like, but personally I wouldn't trade my copy of WMMA3 in for a copy of 4, and as a former owner of WMMA2 (that's the one with the belts as ratings, right?), I'm not convinced that WMMA2 isn't better than both of them. I've never seen any new release from them which is so much better than the previous version as to be worth AAA money. with GDS games newer often doesn't mean better. I imagine pirates must eat e-license protection for breakfast at this point anyway, so what is it protecting? There's no reason why any developer should be inflicting that 1990's-era copy protection on us anymore. If that's never going to happen, I'll just spend my money on other games. For me, a GDS title needs to be on Steam, and it needs to be on sale before I'll touch it. When I lost WMMA4, then got a snotty reply about it when I wrote something on the site, I decided I was never going to buy another title off the GDS site again. Over the years I must have bought 6 or 7 games directly from GDS's website, and I can no longer play any of them because like most computer users, I've switched e-mails a couple of times and changed PCs.
0 kommentar(er)
